Farmer & Bramley: How Courts Treat Lottery Wins After Separation


When it comes to dividing assets after a relationship ends, unexpected windfalls—like lottery winnings—can raise complex legal questions. One landmark Australian case, Farmer & Bramley (2000), explored whether a post-separation lottery win should be included in a property settlement.

What is the case all about?

This case highlights how the Family Court considers each party’s contributions during the relationship, the timing of the windfall, and ongoing responsibilities like child care. The outcome set an important precedent for how such “surprise” assets are treated when partners go their separate ways.

Where does “windfalls” come from?

Before 1995, if a property’s value increased during a marriage due to external factors—such as rezoning or winning the lottery—rather than through the actions of either spouse, these were categorized as “windfalls.” These windfalls were typically treated differently from assets acquired through a spouse’s personal effort or on their behalf.

However, since 1995, windfalls like lottery winnings are generally considered to be the contribution of the person who acquired them—usually the individual who bought the ticket.

Still, the timing and circumstances of receiving a windfall can play a significant role in the outcome of a property settlement.

A notable example is the Farmer & Bramley case. The couple had cohabited for 12 years and shared one child. At the time of their separation, they had no meaningful assets.

In the early years of the relationship, the husband struggled with drug addiction. The wife supported him emotionally and financially, helped him with literacy, and sustained him while he pursued education. Her support enabled him to eventually secure full-time employment.

What happened to Farmer & Bramley’s child?

Following their separation, the child remained in the wife’s primary care, while the husband’s involvement became sporadic.

About a year and a half after they parted ways—and before any property division occurred—the husband won around $5 million in the lottery. Soon after, the wife applied for a property settlement.

In response, the husband tried to avoid financial responsibility: he restructured his assets to avoid paying child support, gambled away more than $100,000, and falsely claimed that the lottery winnings belonged to his mother.

What was court’s decision?

The Court determined that the lottery prize, even though it was won after the separation, was subject to division. The ruling took into account the wife’s significant financial and emotional contributions during the relationship, the stark difference in their financial positions post-separation, and the wife’s continued responsibility for the child without any support from the husband. As a result, the wife was awarded about $750,000.

The Farmer & Bramley case underscores that windfalls, even those received after separation, can be subject to division if one party has made significant contributions during the relationship or continues to bear financial responsibilities, such as caring for a child.

Courts take a holistic view, considering not just who acquired the windfall, but the broader context of the relationship and its aftermath. For individuals navigating separation and property settlement, this case serves as a powerful reminder that timing alone does not determine entitlement—contributions and fairness play a central role.

10 Things Couples in Australia Must Know Before Divorce or Separation

If you are currently living in Australia as a married couple, it is crucial to familiarize yourself with the key aspects of divorce and family law, as understanding these legal principles can help you navigate the complexities of separation, property settlements, child custody, and other important matters that may arise in the event of a relationship breakdown.

  1. No Fault Divorce
  2. Separation Period
  3. Property Settlements
  4. Child Custody and Parental Responsibility
  5. Child Support in Australia
  6. Spousal Maintenance
  7. Family Violence and Abuse
  8. Mediation and Dispute Resolution
  9. De Facto Relationships in Australia
  10. Time Limits for Property Settlements

1. No-Fault Divorce:

Australia operates under a “no-fault” divorce system, meaning that the court doesn’t consider the reasons for the breakdown of the marriage when granting a divorce. The only requirement is that the couple has been separated for at least 12 months.

This approach aims to reduce the emotional and psychological strain on individuals by removing the need to assign blame. In a traditional fault-based divorce system, one party would need to prove that the other was responsible for the marriage’s failure, often leading to a contentious and adversarial process.

The no-fault system simplifies the process, focusing on the fact of the marriage’s breakdown rather than the specific circumstances that led to it.

This is seen as a more constructive way to handle the dissolution of relationships, as it allows both parties to move forward without the additional burden of proving fault.

To file for a no-fault divorce, either spouse can initiate the process, and the application can be made jointly or by a single individual. The only requirement, apart from the 12-month separation period, is that there is no reasonable likelihood of reconciliation between the parties.

In some cases, where the couple has been separated but living under the same roof, the court may require evidence to confirm the separation has been genuine and that there is no intention to reunite. This ensures that the divorce process remains fair and transparent.

In addition to the no-fault provision, Australia has established specific guidelines for the division of property and child custody, ensuring that both parties are treated equitably after the divorce. These matters are considered separately from the divorce application, and the court may intervene if there are disputes.

The no-fault system provides a foundation for a more amicable approach to divorce, fostering an environment that encourages mutual cooperation, especially when children are involved.

Ultimately, this system reflects a broader societal shift towards prioritizing individual well-being and reducing conflict during one of life’s most challenging transitions.

2. Separation Period:

To file for divorce, couples must be separated for at least 12 months. This period can occur while living in the same house, as long as they are no longer living as a married couple.

During the separation period, couples must demonstrate that their relationship has broken down irreparably, which is the basis for filing for divorce in Australia. Although they may still be living under the same roof, the key factor is that they are no longer functioning as a married couple.

This means that they should not be sharing an intimate relationship, financial responsibilities, or household duties in a way that would suggest they are still together as a couple. In such situations, each spouse may maintain separate lives, but it is important to show that the emotional and practical aspects of the marriage have ended.

If couples are living under the same roof, they may be asked to provide evidence of their separation, such as sleeping in separate rooms, having separate finances, or acting as if they were living in separate households.

While this can sometimes be difficult to prove, the court will consider all relevant evidence to assess whether the couple is genuinely separated. In some cases, couples may also undergo mediation or other forms of dispute resolution to assist in finalizing the separation before filing for divorce.

It is important to note that the 12-month separation period does not necessarily mean that a divorce will be granted automatically.

Once the separation period is complete, the couple must file a divorce application with the Family Court of Australia, which will review the application to ensure that all requirements have been met. If there are children involved, the court will also consider whether arrangements for their care and welfare are in place before proceeding with the divorce.

In any case, the separation period is a critical step in the divorce process, helping to ensure that the decision to divorce is made with sufficient time for reflection and consideration.

3. Property Settlements:

Divorce doesn’t automatically mean a division of assets. Couples must apply for property settlement, which can occur after the divorce is finalized or during the divorce proceedings. The division of assets is based on factors like financial and non-financial contributions, and the future needs of each party.

The court will first assess the contributions made by each party during the relationship, both financial and non-financial. Financial contributions include income, savings, and property acquired during the marriage, while non-financial contributions can involve things like homemaking, child-rearing, or supporting the other spouse’s career. The court aims to ensure that both parties’ contributions, whether monetary or otherwise, are acknowledged and fairly considered when dividing property. The length of the marriage and the standard of living during the relationship will also influence the settlement.

Once the contributions are assessed, the court will then consider the future needs of each party. This includes factors such as the age and health of both spouses, their earning capacity, and the care of any children. If one spouse has limited capacity to support themselves or if they have primary responsibility for the children, the court may adjust the property settlement to account for these needs. The goal is to achieve a fair and just division of assets that allows both parties to move forward with their lives while considering any ongoing responsibilities or challenges they may face.

4. Child Custody and Parental Responsibility:

Family law in Australia encourages shared parental responsibility unless it is not in the best interest of the child. This means both parents typically have equal say in decisions about their child’s education, health, and general welfare. Parenting arrangements should be in the child’s best interests, and courts usually prefer shared parenting time when possible.

However, shared parental responsibility does not necessarily mean that the child will spend equal time with both parents. The court will look at a range of factors to determine what is in the best interests of the child, including the child’s age, emotional needs, and the capacity of each parent to provide care and support. In some cases, the court may decide that one parent should have primary care of the child, with the other parent having access or visitation rights, especially if shared care is not deemed feasible due to distance, the child’s wishes, or other practical considerations.

In cases where there is a history of family violence or abuse, shared parental responsibility may not be appropriate. The court prioritizes the safety and well-being of the child, and if there are concerns that one parent poses a risk to the child’s safety, the court may limit or even deny parental responsibility or contact. The family law system is designed to protect vulnerable children, and any decision made by the court will be based on what best supports the child’s physical and emotional development, while considering both parents’ involvement in their child’s life.

5. Child Support in Australia:

Parents are obligated to financially support their children, and the Australian Government’s Department of Human Services (DHS) manages child support arrangements. The amount is based on the parents’ income, the number of children, and time spent with the children.

Child support is calculated using a set of guidelines provided by the Australian Government’s Child Support Agency (CSA), which takes into account both parents’ income and their financial capacity to contribute to their children’s needs. The CSA uses a formula that considers the paying parent’s income, the receiving parent’s income, the number of children involved, and how much time the children spend with each parent. The aim is to ensure that both parents contribute fairly to the financial costs of raising their children, taking into account any special needs or circumstances, such as additional costs for health care or education.

In addition to the basic calculation, the CSA also considers the care arrangements for the children. If one parent has the children more than 35% of the time, this may reduce the amount of child support they are required to pay. This reflects the fact that the parent who has the children in their care for longer periods is already contributing to the costs of raising the children, and their financial support responsibility is adjusted accordingly. The amount of time spent with the children is tracked by both parents, and it can be subject to review if either parent’s circumstances change.

If parents are unable to agree on the amount of child support or if one parent is not paying as required, they can seek assistance from the DHS, which offers a range of services. The DHS can collect child support payments on behalf of the receiving parent, ensure that payments are made on time, and take enforcement actions if necessary. This includes garnishing wages or accessing tax refunds to ensure compliance. If there is a dispute, parents may also be able to apply for a review or an appeal through the DHS or seek resolution through family dispute resolution processes.

Child support arrangements are not static and can be modified if either parent’s financial situation changes. Parents are required to report changes in their income or circumstances, such as a new job, a significant increase or decrease in earnings, or changes in the care arrangements of the children. If a parent’s financial circumstances change, they can apply for a reassessment of their child support payments to ensure that the amount being paid remains fair and reasonable. The flexibility of the system ensures that the ongoing needs of the children are met while taking into account the financial realities of both parents.

6. Spousal Maintenance:

In some cases, one spouse may be required to pay spousal maintenance (financial support) to the other if they are unable to support themselves after the divorce. This is assessed based on need and the other spouse’s ability to pay.

Spousal maintenance is typically awarded when one spouse is unable to meet their reasonable living expenses due to financial dependency on the other, often resulting from the roles they played during the marriage. For instance, if one spouse stayed at home to care for children or support the other spouse’s career, they may find it difficult to re-enter the workforce after separation, especially if they have limited financial resources or employment skills. The court will assess the recipient spouse’s ability to support themselves, considering factors such as age, health, education, work experience, and the length of time they have been out of the workforce.

The spouse who is paying maintenance must have the financial capacity to do so, and the court will evaluate their income, assets, and other financial obligations. This means that even if one spouse is unable to fully support themselves, the other party will not be automatically required to pay maintenance unless they can afford to do so without hardship. In cases where the paying spouse has a higher income or more assets, the court may determine that they should contribute to the financial support of their former partner, particularly if it would allow the recipient spouse to maintain a reasonable standard of living.

Spousal maintenance orders are not permanent and can be modified if there are significant changes in circumstances. For example, if the paying spouse’s financial situation worsens, or if the recipient spouse becomes financially independent or remarries, the maintenance order can be adjusted or terminated. Maintenance orders are reviewed periodically, and either party can apply to the court for a variation if their situation changes. This flexibility ensures that the system remains fair and reflective of both parties’ evolving needs.

It’s also important to note that spousal maintenance is distinct from child support, which is specifically intended for the financial care of children. While both are financial obligations following a divorce, child support is a separate matter and is determined by a different process, with guidelines that focus on the parents’ responsibilities for their children’s well-being. Spousal maintenance, on the other hand, is aimed at supporting the spouse who is unable to support themselves financially, and it is not automatically linked to the needs of any children from the relationship.

7. Family Violence and Abuse:

In cases where there is family violence, the safety and protection of individuals, particularly children, are prioritized. Courts can issue protection orders, and abusive behavior can affect custody arrangements and property settlements.

Family violence in Australia is taken very seriously, and the legal system aims to ensure the safety and well-being of all parties involved, especially those who are vulnerable. Protection orders, such as intervention orders or restraining orders, can be issued by the court to prevent further abuse. These orders can place restrictions on the abusive party, such as barring them from contacting the victim, approaching their home or workplace, or coming into close proximity to them. The primary goal of these orders is to create a safe environment for the victim and any children involved, and they can be granted quickly in urgent situations.

In cases where there is ongoing abuse, the court may also consider the impact of family violence when determining child custody and visitation arrangements. If there is evidence of violence or a threat to the safety of the children, the court may limit or deny access to the abusive parent. In situations where contact is allowed, the court may put safeguards in place, such as supervised visitation, to ensure that the child is not exposed to harm. The court will prioritize the best interests of the child, considering factors such as their safety, emotional well-being, and the capacity of each parent to provide care and protection.

Family violence can also influence property settlements, as the court may take into account the effect of abuse on the financial and emotional contributions of the victim. If the abusive behavior has led to financial or emotional distress for the victim, the court may adjust the division of property to ensure a fair and just outcome. In some cases, victims may be entitled to a larger share of the assets or property in recognition of the harm caused by the abuse. The court will carefully assess the impact of the violence on both the victim and the broader family dynamic, ensuring that any settlement reflects the severity of the circumstances.

8. Mediation and Dispute Resolution:

Before going to court, couples are generally encouraged to try mediation to resolve issues related to divorce, child custody, or property. Mediation is less formal and can often save time and money compared to court proceedings.

Mediation allows both parties to work with a neutral third-party mediator to discuss their concerns and reach a mutually acceptable agreement. The mediator does not make decisions for the couple but helps facilitate communication, ensuring that each side is heard. This collaborative approach often results in more amicable resolutions, as it encourages compromise and understanding, rather than the adversarial nature of court proceedings. Furthermore, since mediation is confidential, any discussions or proposals made during the process cannot be used as evidence in court, which encourages open and honest dialogue.

In family law disputes, particularly those involving children, mediation can also help preserve the relationship between the parents by encouraging cooperative decision-making. For child custody matters, a mediator may assist in developing parenting plans that serve the best interests of the children, taking into consideration factors such as the child’s welfare, emotional needs, and the ability of each parent to care for them. This proactive approach often leads to more sustainable agreements, as the parents are more likely to adhere to a solution that they have had a hand in creating.

However, while mediation is encouraged, it is not mandatory in all cases. If one party refuses to participate or if there is a history of domestic violence, mediation may not be appropriate. In such instances, the court may grant an exemption from mediation or order alternative dispute resolution processes. For complex or high-conflict cases, some individuals may still ultimately need to go to court, but mediation remains a key tool for resolving disputes outside the courtroom in a less contentious and more cost-effective manner.

9. De Facto Relationships in Australia:

If a couple is in a de facto (non-married) relationship and separates, they may be entitled to a property settlement under the Family Law Act if they have been together for at least two years, or have a child together or have made significant financial contributions.

In a de facto relationship, both parties may be entitled to a property settlement similar to that of a married couple, depending on the circumstances of the relationship. The court will assess the financial and non-financial contributions of both parties during the relationship, such as income, property, and homemaking or caregiving responsibilities. The duration of the relationship, the nature of the contributions, and the future needs of both parties will also be considered when determining how property should be divided.

To initiate a property settlement in a de facto relationship, an application must typically be made within two years of the separation. If this time frame is not adhered to, similar to marriage, the party seeking the settlement must seek leave from the court to apply. The court may grant permission if there are special reasons, such as a significant change in circumstances or hardship to one of the parties. Therefore, it’s important for individuals in de facto relationships to take timely action to protect their legal and financial interests.

De facto relationships in Australia are subject to specific legal tests that can sometimes make matters more complicated than expected. Factors such as whether the couple lived together on a permanent basis, whether they shared financial responsibilities, and the intentions of the parties at the time of separation can influence how the property settlement is determined. Seeking legal advice early in the process can help clarify rights and responsibilities, ensuring that both parties understand their position under the law.

10. Time Limits for Property Settlements:

After a divorce is finalized, there is a 12-month limit to apply for a property settlement. Failing to apply within that time frame can result in a loss of the right to claim a share of property, unless special circumstances exist.

To further clarify, the 12-month time limit begins from the date your divorce is finalized, not from the date of separation or when you initially applied for divorce. This strict time frame is in place to encourage timely resolution of financial matters and to prevent prolonged uncertainty regarding property ownership.

In cases where you miss the deadline, there are limited circumstances under which the court may allow a property settlement claim to proceed. These include instances where you can demonstrate that there has been a significant change in your financial situation, or if there is a substantial risk of hardship if a claim is not allowed. However, these exceptions are not guaranteed, and it is up to the court to decide whether they apply.

It’s also important to note that even if you are still within the 12-month period, you may be required to attend mediation or other dispute resolution processes before pursuing a court application. This is intended to encourage amicable settlements and reduce the burden on the court system. Therefore, taking action early, and with professional guidance, can help ensure that your interests are properly protected.

These aspects form the core of Australian divorce and family law. It’s always recommended to seek legal advice when navigating these complex areas.

What Are Average Costs of Divorce in Australia?

The cost of divorce in Australia varies based on several factors, including the complexity of the case, legal representation, and whether the divorce is contested or uncontested. Here’s a breakdown of potential expenses:

1. Court Filing Fees:

  • Standard Application:
    As of July 2023, the fee for filing a divorce application is $1,060.
  • Reduced Fee:
    Eligible individuals, such as concession cardholders or those facing financial hardship, may qualify for a reduced fee of $350.

2. Legal Representation:

  • Uncontested Divorce:
    If both parties agree on all terms, legal fees are generally lower. Some law firms offer fixed-fee services ranging from $1,000 to $1,500.
  • Contested Divorce:
    Disputes over property, child custody, or other matters can significantly increase costs. Legal fees in such cases can range from $5,000 to $10,000 or more, depending on the complexity and duration of proceedings.

3. Additional Expenses:

  • Mediation and Counseling:
    Engaging in mediation to resolve disputes can incur additional costs, which may be more economical than prolonged court battles.
  • Property and Financial Settlements:
    Negotiating and formalizing property divisions or financial agreements can add to the overall expense.

4. Average Total Costs:

  • Amicable Separations:
    For couples who reach agreements without significant disputes, the average cost per person is approximately $21,000.
  • Litigated Cases:
    If the matter proceeds to court, expenses can escalate to between $50,000 and $100,000, with proceedings potentially lasting up to three years.

Cost-Saving Strategies:

  • Mediation:
    Opting for mediation can help resolve disputes amicably and reduce legal fees.
  • Fixed-Fee Services:
    Some law firms offer fixed-fee packages for uncontested divorces, providing cost predictability.
  • Self-Representation:
    Handling the divorce process independently can save on legal fees, though it’s advisable to seek legal advice to understand your rights and obligations.

It’s important to note that these figures are approximate and can vary based on individual circumstances. Consulting with a family law professional can provide a clearer estimate tailored to your specific situation.

What is the Divorce rate in Australia?

In Australia, the overall divorce rate has shown fluctuations over recent years, but there has been a long-term decline since the 1970s. As of 2023, the crude divorce rate stood at 2.3 divorces per 1,000 people aged over 16, down slightly from 2.4 in 2022. The median duration of marriages before divorce was 13 years, reflecting that couples tend to separate and initiate divorce after more than a decade of being together. Interestingly, this statistic has gradually increased, highlighting that marriages are lasting slightly longer before breaking down.

Victoria, one of the most populous states, contributes significantly to the national divorce numbers. In recent data, the state reported trends in line with national figures, though local variations occur. For instance, during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, marriage and divorce dynamics were impacted, with many relationships experiencing strain due to lockdowns and financial pressures. The easing of restrictions saw adjustments in both marriage and divorce statistics, with a notable spike in divorce applications following the pandemic lockdowns.

The factors influencing divorce rates include economic stress, infidelity, communication issues, and changes in societal norms. Additionally, second marriages have a higher probability of ending in divorce, with 60% of such marriages dissolving, often due to the complexities of blended families and financial pressures from previous relationships. This trend reflects the unique challenges that remarried couples face compared to first marriages.

Overall, while divorce rates have decreased compared to historical highs, they continue to be a significant part of family dynamics in Australia. The impact of these divorces on children has also been analyzed, with a decreasing percentage of divorces involving minors. Older age at marriage and higher median ages at divorce indicate a societal shift toward later-life relationship dissolutions, influenced by changing life patterns and priorities.

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics

SINA
Sina Taghdir LLB
Family Lawyer

Call & Discuss Your Case
03 9794 8668